ResearchBerg

ResearchBerg promotes discovery by disseminating reliable research, encouraging the emergence of new ideas, and advocating for open research. ResearchBerg produces academic publications in a variety of areas, including social sciences, humanities, natural sciences, biological and medical sciences, education, business, and management.  All of our journals are available online and are free to download. 

How to submit

All contributions can be made through our online system. Authors can immediately upload manuscript files to the editorial board and track the status of their papers during the review process using this method.
Authors can also send their articles to the submission management staff by emailing them to [email protected] Please include in the email the name of the journal you are submitting to.

Charges for Publication: There are no fees associated with submitting and publishing all sorts of articles in any journal of ResearchBerg. 

Journals

  • ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology

    ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology (RRST) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes research articles, reviews, and technical reports in the fields of science and technology. It covers current and relevant advancements in science and technology across several disciplines.

    Peer-Review Policy for the ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology

    1. Purpose and Scope

    The peer-review process is essential for maintaining the quality and integrity of published research in the "ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology." This policy outlines the process, criteria, and ethical considerations to ensure that all submitted works undergo a rigorous and fair evaluation.

    2. Initial Manuscript Assessment

    All manuscripts submitted to the journal will first undergo an initial assessment by the editorial team. This step ensures that the submission aligns with the journal's scope, follows the prescribed formatting, and adheres to ethical guidelines.

    3. Selection of Reviewers

    For each manuscript that passes the initial assessment, the editorial team will select a minimum of two external reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers are chosen based on their academic credentials, publication record, and the absence of any potential conflicts of interest with the authors.

    4. Double-Blind Review Process

    To eliminate potential biases, the journal adopts a double-blind review process. This means that both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the evaluation phase.

    5. Review Criteria

    Reviewers are provided with a standardized evaluation form that addresses the following key criteria:

    • Originality and significance of the research.
    • Clarity and coherence of the research question or hypothesis.
    • Adequacy and appropriateness of the methodology.
    • Accuracy and relevance of data analysis.
    • Soundness of conclusions drawn.
    • Relevance and adequacy of citations.
    • Overall contribution to the field.

    6. Reviewer Recommendations

    After assessing the manuscript, reviewers can make one of the following recommendations:

    • Accept without revisions.
    • Accept with minor revisions.
    • Revise and resubmit (major revisions required).
    • Reject due to specific deficiencies or irrelevance.

    7. Decision-making

    The editorial team consolidates reviewer feedback and makes the final decision regarding the manuscript's status. The corresponding author will receive a decision letter, which includes reviewer comments and, if applicable, instructions for revisions.

    8. Revision Process

    If revisions are required, authors are expected to address each point raised by the reviewers. A revised manuscript should be accompanied by a detailed response letter that outlines the changes made and provides justification for any points not addressed.

    9. Post-Acceptance and Publication

    Manuscripts accepted for publication will undergo a final proofreading and formatting phase. Authors may be contacted to clarify any ambiguities or address minor issues.

    10. Ethical Considerations

    All participants in the peer-review process are expected to adhere to the highest ethical standards. This includes:

    • Reviewers should disclose any potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves if necessary.
    • Reviewers should treat manuscripts confidentially and not use the knowledge gained for personal advantage.
    • Authors should respect feedback, even if they disagree, and engage constructively.

    11. Appeals Process

    If authors disagree with the decision, they have the right to appeal by providing a detailed rationale. The editorial board will re-assess the manuscript and the reviews, potentially seeking an additional opinion if deemed necessary.

    Editor-in-chief

    Dr. Rashid Aziz Faridi

    Professor

    Aligarh Muslim University, India

     

  • Contemporary Issues in Behavioral and Social Sciences

    Contemporary Issues in Behavioral and Social Sciences is a peer-reviewed academic journal that was first launched in 2018. The journal provides a platform for researchers, scholars, and practitioners to publish original research articles, reviews, and theoretical papers on a wide range of topics related to behavioral and social sciences. The journal covers various fields including psychology, sociology, anthropology, education, and communication. The primary focus of the journal is to publish high-quality research that explores the contemporary issues and challenges faced by individuals, communities, and societies in the modern world. The journal is committed to promoting interdisciplinary research and publishing cutting-edge research that has implications for theory, practice, and policy. The journal also welcomes contributions from both established scholars and emerging researchers.

  • Empirical Quests for Management Essences

    Empirical Quests for Management Essences (EQME) is dedicated to disseminating high scholarly research publications in the field of management. Innovative concepts or insights on existing research are encouraged in the journal. EQME is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, influential research that contributes to a better understanding of management concerns. EQME welcomes original empirical contributions as well as conceptual studies that further our grasp of existing theory.

    Current Editor-in-chief:

    Dr. Mazuwin Binti Haja Maideen

    Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

    Contact: [email protected]

     

     

     

  • Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing

    The Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing strives to convey the most current research findings and breakthroughs in the field of applied AI and cloud comuting. The journal focuses on how AI and cloud computing may be used in sectors as diverse as science, architecture, commerce, medical, automation, production, art, management, finance, and more, this Special Issue . We would like to extend an invitation to academics and professionals to submit high-quality research and review papers. 

  • Artificial Intelligence in Society

    The Artificial Intelligence in Society (AIS) project focuses on the AI environment and raises important policy issues. Its purpose is to promote a broad discussion on crucial policy issues such as labor market developments and retraining for the digital age; privacy; transparency of AI-powered judgments; and the responsibility, security, and safety questions that AI raises.

  • Reviews of Contemporary Business Analytics

    Reviews of Contemporary Business Analytics is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the latest developments, trends, and practices in the field of business analytics. The journal covers a wide range of topics related to business analytics, including data mining, predictive modeling, machine learning, artificial intelligence, data visualization, and data-driven decision making. It publishes original research papers, case studies, literature reviews, and technical notes that provide insights into the current state of the field and its future directions.

    Reviews of Contemporary Business Analytics (RCBA) enables corporations and entities to make prevalent, swifter, intelligent, data-driven, and critical decisions by providing the necessary resources and tools.
    The journal encourages valuable and implementable exploration of various concepts, techniques, procedures, and philosophies. We seek to release articles that employ real-world data and explanations to address existing problems in a creative and original manner.