https://researchberg.com/index.php/rrst <p>ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology (<strong>RRST</strong>) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes research articles, reviews, and technical reports in the fields of science and technology. It covers current and relevant advancements in science and technology across several disciplines.</p> <p><strong>Peer-Review Policy for the ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology</strong></p> <p><strong>1. Purpose and Scope</strong></p> <p>The peer-review process is essential for maintaining the quality and integrity of published research in the <em>"ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology."</em> This policy outlines the process, criteria, and ethical considerations to ensure that all submitted works undergo a rigorous and fair evaluation.</p> <p><strong>2. Initial Manuscript Assessment</strong></p> <p>All manuscripts submitted to the journal will first undergo an initial assessment by the editorial team. This step ensures that the submission aligns with the journal's scope, follows the prescribed formatting, and adheres to ethical guidelines.</p> <p><strong>3. Selection of Reviewers</strong></p> <p>For each manuscript that passes the initial assessment, the editorial team will select a minimum of two external reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers are chosen based on their academic credentials, publication record, and the absence of any potential conflicts of interest with the authors.</p> <p><strong>4. Double-Blind Review Process</strong></p> <p>To eliminate potential biases, the journal adopts a double-blind review process. This means that both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the evaluation phase.</p> <p><strong>5. Review Criteria</strong></p> <p>Reviewers are provided with a standardized evaluation form that addresses the following key criteria:</p> <ul> <li>Originality and significance of the research.</li> <li>Clarity and coherence of the research question or hypothesis.</li> <li>Adequacy and appropriateness of the methodology.</li> <li>Accuracy and relevance of data analysis.</li> <li>Soundness of conclusions drawn.</li> <li>Relevance and adequacy of citations.</li> <li>Overall contribution to the field.</li> </ul> <p><strong>6. Reviewer Recommendations</strong></p> <p>After assessing the manuscript, reviewers can make one of the following recommendations:</p> <ul> <li>Accept without revisions.</li> <li>Accept with minor revisions.</li> <li>Revise and resubmit (major revisions required).</li> <li>Reject due to specific deficiencies or irrelevance.</li> </ul> <p><strong>7. Decision-making</strong></p> <p>The editorial team consolidates reviewer feedback and makes the final decision regarding the manuscript's status. The corresponding author will receive a decision letter, which includes reviewer comments and, if applicable, instructions for revisions.</p> <p><strong>8. Revision Process</strong></p> <p>If revisions are required, authors are expected to address each point raised by the reviewers. A revised manuscript should be accompanied by a detailed response letter that outlines the changes made and provides justification for any points not addressed.</p> <p><strong>9. Post-Acceptance and Publication</strong></p> <p>Manuscripts accepted for publication will undergo a final proofreading and formatting phase. Authors may be contacted to clarify any ambiguities or address minor issues.</p> <p><strong>10. Ethical Considerations</strong></p> <p>All participants in the peer-review process are expected to adhere to the highest ethical standards. This includes:</p> <ul> <li>Reviewers should disclose any potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves if necessary.</li> <li>Reviewers should treat manuscripts confidentially and not use the knowledge gained for personal advantage.</li> <li>Authors should respect feedback, even if they disagree, and engage constructively.</li> </ul> <p><strong>11. Appeals Process</strong></p> <p>If authors disagree with the decision, they have the right to appeal by providing a detailed rationale. The editorial board will re-assess the manuscript and the reviews, potentially seeking an additional opinion if deemed necessary.</p> <p><strong>Editor-in-chief</strong></p> <p><a href="https://www.amu.ac.in/faculty/geography/rashid-aziz-faridi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr. Rashid Aziz Faridi</a></p> <p>Professor</p> <p>Aligarh Muslim University, India</p> <p> </p> ResearchBerg en-US ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology https://researchberg.com/index.php/rrst/article/view/176 <p>Quantum computing is poised to revolutionize the pharmaceutical industry and dramatically accelerate the drug discovery and development process. By harnessing the power of quantum mechanics, quantum computers can analyze molecular interactions and simulate chemical processes with unprecedented speed and accuracy. This article provides a comprehensive overview of how quantum computing will impact drug R&amp;D, with a focus on the key application areas of molecular modeling, genomics, clinical trials, and drug discovery. An in-depth analysis is provided on how quantum algorithms, quantum machine learning, and quantum simulations will enable faster and more targeted drug design, predictive modeling of drug interactions, accelerated genomics analysis, and improved clinical trial design. The challenges facing the development of quantum computing in pharma are also discussed. Overall, quantum computing offers immense promise to slash the time and cost of bringing new life-saving drugs to market, as well as unlocking new capabilities in personalized medicine and drug optimization.</p> Ahmed Hassan Ahmed Ibrahim Copyright (c) 2023 Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2023-11-26 2023-11-26 3 11 1 16